GMAT备考范文

写范文发表于:2020-07-25 10:04:40

theconclusionofthisargumentisthattechnologicalinnovationaswellastheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesignwillbeminimizedinthefuture.theauthorslineofreasoningisthattheimpositionofstrictsafetycodesonpublicbuildingsinhibitstheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesign,becausetheydiscouragetechnologicalinnovationwithinthebuildingindustry.furthermore,thestrictnessofthecodesgoverningpublicbuildingsdiscouragestechnologicalinnovationbecausethesurestwayforarchitectsandbuilderstopassthecodesistoconstructbuildingsthatusethesamematerialsandmethodsthatarecurrentlyallowed.thisargumentisunconvincingfortworeasons.

inthefirstplace,theauthorsconclusiongoesbeyondtheevidencepresented.theevidencecitedpertainsonlytotheconstructionofpublicbuildings,yettheauthordrawsaconclusionaboutthebuildingindustryasawhole.technologicalinnovationandarchitecturalexperimentationinstyleanddesignintheconstructionofprivatebuildingsisnotprecludedbythereasonscited.consequently,intheabsenceofevidencethatsimilarproblemsbesettheconstructionofprivatelyownedbuildings,theauthorsconclusionisnotwarranted.

inthesecondplace,itisnotevidentthatthestrictsafetycodesgoverningpublicbuildingswillhavetheeffectspredictedbytheauthor.architecturalstylesanddesignarenotdictatedsolelybythematerialsorthemethodsemployedinconstruction.consequently,itisprematuretoconcludethatlittleevolutioninstyleanddesignwilloccurbecausethematerialsandmethodswilllikelyremainthesame.moreover,technologicalinnovationisnotrestrictedtotheuseofnewmaterialsandmethods.significanttechnologicalinnovationcanbeachievedbyapplyingexistingmethodstonewsituationsandbyfindingnewusesforfamiliarmaterials.