theconclusionofthisargumentisthattechnologicalinnovationaswellastheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesignwillbeminimizedinthefuture.theauthorslineofreasoningisthattheimpositionofstrictsafetycodesonpublicbuildingsinhibitstheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesign,becausetheydiscouragetechnologicalinnovationwithinthebuildingindustry.furthermore,thestrictnessofthecodesgoverningpublicbuildingsdiscouragestechnologicalinnovationbecausethesurestwayforarchitectsandbuilderstopassthecodesistoconstructbuildingsthatusethesamematerialsandmethodsthatarecurrentlyallowed.thisargumentisunconvincingfortworeasons.
inthefirstplace,theauthorsconclusiongoesbeyondtheevidencepresented.theevidencecitedpertainsonlytotheconstructionofpublicbuildings,yettheauthordrawsaconclusionaboutthebuildingindustryasawhole.technologicalinnovationandarchitecturalexperimentationinstyleanddesignintheconstructionofprivatebuildingsisnotprecludedbythereasonscited.consequently,intheabsenceofevidencethatsimilarproblemsbesettheconstructionofprivatelyownedbuildings,theauthorsconclusionisnotwarranted.
inthesecondplace,itisnotevidentthatthestrictsafetycodesgoverningpublicbuildingswillhavetheeffectspredictedbytheauthor.architecturalstylesanddesignarenotdictatedsolelybythematerialsorthemethodsemployedinconstruction.consequently,itisprematuretoconcludethatlittleevolutioninstyleanddesignwilloccurbecausethematerialsandmethodswilllikelyremainthesame.moreover,technologicalinnovationisnotrestrictedtotheuseofnewmaterialsandmethods.significanttechnologicalinnovationcanbeachievedbyapplyingexistingmethodstonewsituationsandbyfindingnewusesforfamiliarmaterials.
第2篇：GMAT备考范文
theconclusionofthisargumentisthattechnologicalinnovationaswellastheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesignwillbeminimizedinthefuture.theauthorslineofreasoningisthattheimpositionofstrictsafetycodesonpublicbuildingsinhibitstheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesign,becausetheydiscouragetechnologicalinnovationwithinthebuildingindustry.furthermore,thestrictnessofthecodesgoverningpublicbuildingsdiscouragestechnologicalinnovationbecausethesurestwayforarchitectsandbuilderstopassthecodesistoconstructbuildingsthatusethesamematerialsandmethodsthatarecurrentlyallowed.thisargumentisunconvincingfortworeasons.
inthefirstplace,theauthorsconclusiongoesbeyondtheevidencepresented.theevidencecitedpertainsonlytotheconstructionofpublicbuildings,yettheauthordrawsaconclusionaboutthebuildingindustryasawhole.technologicalinnovationandarchitecturalexperimentationinstyleanddesignintheconstructionofprivatebuildingsisnotprecludedbythereasonscited.consequently,intheabsenceofevidencethatsimilarproblemsbesettheconstructionofprivatelyownedbuildings,theauthorsconclusionisnotwarranted.
inthesecondplace,itisnotevidentthatthestrictsafetycodesgoverningpublicbuildingswillhavetheeffectspredictedbytheauthor.architecturalstylesanddesignarenotdictatedsolelybythematerialsorthemethodsemployedinconstruction.consequently,itisprematuretoconcludethatlittleevolutioninstyleanddesignwilloccurbecausethematerialsandmethodswilllikelyremainthesame.moreover,technologicalinnovationisnotrestrictedtotheuseofnewmaterialsandmethods.significanttechnologicalinnovationcanbeachievedbyapplyingexistingmethodstonewsituationsandbyfindingnewusesforfamiliarmaterials.
第3篇：备考资料GMAT范文
thefollowingappearedintheopinioncolumnofafinancialmagazine.
onaverage,middle-agedconsumersdevote39percentoftheirretailexpendituretodepartmentstoreproductsandservices,whileforyoungerconsumerstheaverageisonly25percent.sincethenumberofmiddle-agedpeoplewillincreasedramaticallywithinthenextdecade,departmentstorescanexpectretailsalestoincreasesignificantlyduringthatperiod.furthermore,totakeadvantageofthetrend,thesestoresshouldbegintoreplacesomeofthoseproductsintendedtoattracttheyoungerconsumerwithproductsintendedtoattractthemiddle-agedconsumer.
discusshowwellreasoned...etc.
sampleessay1:
theargumentthatdepartmentretailsaleswillincreaseinthenext10yearsandthusdepartmentstoresshouldbegintoreplaceproductstoattractmiddle-agedconsumersisnotentirelylogicallyconvincing,sinceitomitscertaincrucialassumptions
firstofall,theargumentignorestheabsoluteamountofretailexpenditureofmiddle-agedandyoungerconsumersdevotedtodepartmentstoreproductsandservices.althoughyoungerconsumersspendasmallerpercentageoftheirretailexpendituretodepartmentstoreproductsthandothemiddle-agedconsumers,theymightactuallyspendmoreintermsoftheabsoluteamount.